HomeAboutusEditorial BoardCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 847

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  


 
 Table of Contents    
SHORT COMMUNICATION  
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 46  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 537-540
 

Maternity leave access and breastfeeding practices among working mothers in an urban residential area of East Delhi


1 Department of Community Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Paediatrics, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission20-Dec-2029
Date of Acceptance04-Sep-2021
Date of Web Publication13-Oct-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Khan Amir Maroof
Department of Community Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, 414, 4th Floor, College Block, Dilshad Garden, New Delhi - 110 095
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_1056_20

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Background: Despite the provision of maternity leave benefits under the maternity benefit amendment act, its access by working mothers in the community is unknown. Objectives: The objective is to find out access to maternity leave among working mothers and its association with breastfeeding practices. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional, community-based study was conducted among 150 working mothers with children 6 months to 3 years of age. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were applied to find the association of breastfeeding practices with maternity leave and independent predictors of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), respectively. Results: Paid maternity leave was accessed by majority (103, 68.7%) of the working mothers. EBF among mothers working in government organizations was more (Adjusted odds ratio: 2.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.0–5.1) than in private organizations. Conclusion: Lower proportion of mothers in private organizations had availed paid maternity leave as compared to government organizations. Increase in coverage of maternity benefits in the private sector is needed.


Keywords: Exclusive breastfeeding, maternity leave, working mothers


How to cite this article:
Majhi N, Maroof KA, Sharma AK, Shah D. Maternity leave access and breastfeeding practices among working mothers in an urban residential area of East Delhi. Indian J Community Med 2021;46:537-40

How to cite this URL:
Majhi N, Maroof KA, Sharma AK, Shah D. Maternity leave access and breastfeeding practices among working mothers in an urban residential area of East Delhi. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 27];46:537-40. Available from: https://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2021/46/3/537/328163





   Introduction Top


In India, recently the establishment of the Maternity Benefit Amendment Act, 2017 increased the duration of entitlement of paid maternity leave from 12 to 26 weeks.[1] This provision is aligned with the WHO recommendations that exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) should be continued till 6 months of age.[2] Studies show that in working mothers, breastfeeding rates are lower due to the challenges they face as an employee to continue EBF such as the need to return to work early.[3],[4] Provision of paid maternity leave with longer duration can positively affect breastfeeding among employed mothers in terms of exclusivity and also its duration.[5] Although maternity benefit is entitled to working women, the extent to which these provisions actually reach the working mothers in the community is limited. Various factors affecting EBF outcomes and its association with maternal employment have been explored, but there is a paucity of published data regarding the actual utilization of maternity leave by the beneficiaries. This study aimed to generate evidence regarding the maternity benefits reaching working women at the community level and its association with breastfeeding practices.


   Materials and Methods Top


A community-based survey was conducted in Dilshad Garden in East Delhi after approval from the institutional ethics committee vide letter no. IEC-HR/2018/36/29R was obtained. Due to the unavailability of data, we considered the proportion of working mothers availing paid maternity leave as 50%. With an absolute precision of 8%, the calculated sample size was 150 (Epi Info™ 7.2.2.6, Atlanta, GA). Eligibility criteria were: Working woman residing in the residential area of Dilshad Garden for at least 6 months, who was employed at least 8 weeks before the date of delivery and had a child in the age group of 6 months to 3 years. In cases where the mother had more than one child meeting the eligibility criteria, the youngest child was included in the study. We excluded working mothers with adopted children as it would not be possible to assess breastfeeding practices in such cases. A semi-structured, prevalidated, and interviewer-administered schedule was used for data collection including information about (a) sociodemographic details such as age, education status, income, and type of family, (b) delivery related details such as the mode of delivery, gestational age at birth, (c) maternity leave details including pay status, leave duration, and type of organization, and (d) infant feeding practices including breastfeeding initiation and EBF. Questionnaire for infant feeding practices was partially adapted from the WHO's manual of “Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices.”[6] Maternity leave and workplace details recorded were pertaining to the organization where mothers were employed at the time of conception. Households were approached consecutively to look for eligible participants and face-to-face interview was conducted by the principal investigator. The outcome measures were: (1) Proportion of working mothers of children 6 months to 3 years having availed paid maternity leave (2) Odds ratios for the association of maternity leave availed status and breastfeeding practices. As mothers opt for unpaid maternity leave also, which can influence the breastfeeding duration, we have considered both paid and unpaid maternity leave together.

Statistical analysis

The SPSS software (IBM SPSS, Version 20.0, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data analysis. Paid maternity leave availed and maternity leave duration in various organizations were expressed in proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Normally distributed variable such as mother's age was presented as mean and standard deviation and non-normally distributed data such as the duration of EBF were expressed as median and interquartile range. Chi-square test was applied to explore the association of breastfeeding practices such as early initiation of breastfeeding, EBF for 6 months, current breastfeeding status, and the use of feeding-bottle with the duration of maternity leave. Mann–Whitney U test was applied to find the statistical significance of the observed differences between duration of EBF in the groups based on the duration of maternity leave availed. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were computed by multivariate logistic regression analysis by including the variables with P < 0.25 in the model. Pay status of maternity leave, and mother being a healthcare provider were also included in the regression model as we considered it to have a bearing on EBF. All the tests were two-tailed and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


   Results Top


With response rate of 82.4% (150/182), we included 150 mothers in the study. The bio-social characteristics of the working mothers and children are depicted in [Table 1]. Around half of the mothers (52.7%) were employed in a government organization. About two-third (68.7%, 95% CI: 61.2%–76.1%) of the participants had access to paid maternity leave. Majority (83.1%, 95% CI: 74.4%–91.8%) of the mothers working in government organization had access to paid maternity leave, whereas among the mothers in the private organization it was 55.7% (95% CI: 44.7%–66.6%). In private organization, mothers who availed no maternity leave were 35.5%, maternity leave of <26 weeks was availed by 24.0%, and maternity leave of ≥26 weeks was availed by 40.5% and in case of mothers employed at government organization they were 7.0%, 12.7%, and 80.3%, respectively. It was found that EBF for 6 months was more in mothers with paid maternity leave of 26 weeks (OR: 5.8, 95% CI: 1.5–26.5) than those mothers with shorter duration of paid maternity leave. The introduction of bottle-feeding was twice as much (P = 0.046) among mothers employed in private organizations as compared to those working in government organizations. The breastfeeding practices among working mothers with respect to maternity leave duration are given in [Table 2]. EBF for 6 months among mothers working in government organization was more (AOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.0–5.1) than in private organization [Table 3].
Table 1: Bio-social characteristics of working mothers and children (n=150)

Click here to view
Table 2: Breastfeeding practices with respect to the duration of maternity leave, including paid and unpaid (n=150)

Click here to view
Table 3: Multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis for significant predictors of exclusive breastfeeding for six months (n=150)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Around two-thirds of working mothers had access to paid maternity leave. In our study, we only included mothers working in formal sector. We also found that half of the working mothers, in our study were employed in government organizations which is higher as compared to those in the general population. This may be due to the many government organizations such as hospitals and administrative offices in the vicinity of the surveyed area. We could not find any study for paid maternity leave access from India. There are few studies from abroad exploring access to paid maternity leave. A study from Thailand[7] has also reported similar results, whereas in the United States reportedly lower proportion of mothers had access to paid maternity leave.[8] This could be because, in the United States, provision of unpaid/paid leave to employees on childbirth/adoption is at the discretion of the employer under the Family and Medical Leave Act.[9]

We found majority of mothers employed in government organizations had access to paid maternity leave of ≥ 26 weeks. We could not find any published study which explored maternity leave duration across government and private organizations. Working mothers with less than two children are entitled provision of paid maternity leave of 26 weeks under the Maternity Benefit Amendment Act. Compliance of the private sector to it should be ensured to increase access to maternity leave among working mothers.

There was no significant difference in breastfeeding practices such as 6 months of EBF or bottle-feeding practices and others, between those mothers who had availed maternity leave of ≥26 weeks or shorter duration. Apparently, the present provision of maternity leave duration is not having a significant effect on breastfeeding practices. Longer maternity leave duration was found to be significantly associated with higher proportion of EBF by Chai et al.[5] Although we found that EBF was longer in mothers with maternity leave of ≥ 26 weeks, the difference was not statistically significant. Lesser duration of EBF was found significantly associated with shorter maternity leave in some studies.[10],[11] The cut-off for the duration of maternity leave in our study was 6 months whereas, in the aforementioned studies the cut-off was 2 or 3 months. Either the maternity leave duration must be extended or factors, other than the duration of maternity leave, should be explored to enhance breastfeeding practices.

Those mothers working in government organizations had a higher 6 months EBF as compared to private organizations, and this was found to be an independent predictor. Such association between EBF and the mother working as a government employee has been noted in other studies too.[12],[13] More studies, comparing organizations are needed to find out what specific factors in an organizational environment promote breastfeeding. Policies to improve breastfeeding practices among working mothers should focus on providing supportive environment for breastfeeding. Similar to our findings, maternal education status was not associated with EBF in Central Ethiopia.[11] Unlike our observation, in Brazil paid maternity leave was significantly associated with EBF.[14] However, the EBF status was observed in infants below 6 months in the study whereas in our study children above 6 months were included. This could explain why the findings were different. We did not find socioeconomic status to be a predictor of 6-month EBF but in another study from India done in a southern state, socioeconomic status was significantly associated with EBF.[15] Since the study used a tool other than modified Kuppuswamy scale for socioeconomic status and also included nonworking mothers the difference in findings is plausible.

Limitations of the study

The results are not generalizable as it has been conducted in a single residential area of Delhi, and all the mothers were formal sector employees. We could not find out the facilitators and barriers faced by the employers in providing maternity benefits. This could have provided a better insight into the issue. Future studies can explore this domain. The statistical tests applied are exploratory in nature and not confirmatory as the sample size was primarily for estimating the paid maternity leave access in the community.


   Conclusion Top


Around one-third of the working mothers in formal sector did not have access to paid maternity leave. Availability of paid maternity leave and 6 month-EBF was more among mothers employed in government sector as compared to private. There is a need to increase the coverage of maternity benefit for mothers working in the private sector.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment. Maternity Benefit Amendment Act, 2017; 2017. Available from: https://labour.gov.in/whatsnew/maternity-benefit-amendment-act2017. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 02].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organization. Malnutrition; 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malnutrition. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 10].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet 2016;387:491-504.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Castetbon K, Boudet-Berquier J, Salanave B. Combining breastfeeding and work: Findings from the Epifane population-based birth cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20:110.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Chai Y, Nandi A, Heymann J. Does extending the duration of legislated paid maternity leave improve breastfeeding practices? Evidence from 38 low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health 2018;3:e001032.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
World Health Organization. Indicators for Assessing Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices; 2010. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44368/9789241599757_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&ua=1. [Last accessed on 2020 Jun 19].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Sinsuksai N, Nuampa S, Chanprapaph P. Factors predicting 6-month-exclusive breastfeeding in mothers with cesarean section. J Nurs Sci 2017;35:14-22.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Jou J, Kozhimannil KB, Abraham JM, Blewett LA, McGovern PM. Paid maternity leave in the United States: Associations with maternal and infant health. Matern Child Health J 2018;22:216-25.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
United States Department of Labour. The Employee's Guide to Family and Medical Leave Act the Family and Medical Leave Act; 2015. Available from: https://www.dol.gov/whd/fmla/employeeguide.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 09].  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Dun-Dery EJ, Laar AK. Exclusive breastfeeding among city-dwelling professional working mothers in Ghana. Int Breastfeed J 2016;11:23.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kebede T, Woldemichael K, Jarso H, Bekele BB. Exclusive breastfeeding cessation and associated factors among employed mothers in Dukem Town, Central Ethiopia. Int Breastfeed J 2020;15:6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Abou-ElWafa HS, El-Gilany AH. Maternal work and exclusive breastfeeding in Mansoura, Egypt. Fam Pract 2019;36:568-72.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Alhaji MM, Sharbawi R, Majeed A, Tuah NAA. Sociodemographic factors associated with uptake of exclusive breast-Feeding practice in Brunei Darussalam. Brunei Int Med J 2017;13:12-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Rimes KA, de Oliveira MI, Boccolini CS. Maternity leave and exclusive breastfeeding. Rev Saude Publica 2019;53:1-12.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Reddy NS, Sindhu KN, Ramanujam K, Bose A, Kang G, Mohan VR. Exclusive breastfeeding practices in an urban settlement of Vellore, southern India: Findings from the MAL-ED birth cohort. Int Breastfeed J 2019;14:29.  Back to cited text no. 15
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
           

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (357 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed264    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded36    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007