HomeAboutusEditorial BoardCurrent issuearchivesSearch articlesInstructions for authorsSubscription detailsAdvertise

  Login  | Users online: 864

   Ahead of print articles    Bookmark this page Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font size Increase font size  


 
 Table of Contents    
SHORT COMMUNICATION  
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 46  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 524-527
 

A quality improvement study on improving communication between health-care provider and laboring woman: A step toward respectful maternity care


1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
2 Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Date of Submission20-Dec-2017
Date of Acceptance21-Apr-2016
Date of Web Publication13-Oct-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Aashima Arora
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh - 160 012
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_1034_20

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Background: Effective communication between health-care providers (HCP) and women during labor is a key component for providing dignified and consented maternity care. The quality improvement (QI) study was planned to improve the communication skills of HCP to provide dignified and consented care in the labor ward. Methodology: This study was conducted at the labor ward of a tertiary care hospital. To assess the magnitude of nondignified and nonconsented care, baseline data were collected from the women who had normal vaginal delivery through interviews using a prestructured questionnaire. The HCPs were also interviewed about the reasons for nondignified and nonconsented care. Various change ideas were tested through the plan-do-study-act cycle to sensitize the HCP with World Health Organization recommendations on intrapartum communication. Results: There was a marked improvement in communication between HCP and women in labor, i.e., addressing the woman by her name (100%), consent before each clinical examination (93%), and providing information about the progress of labor after each examination (50%). Conclusion: A QI approach is feasible and effective as a behavior change intervention to provide dignified and consented care in the existing settings.


Keywords: Consented care, dignified care, effective communication, plan-do-study-act cycle, respectful maternity care


How to cite this article:
Sharma B, Sikka P, Arora A, Assi GS, Suri V. A quality improvement study on improving communication between health-care provider and laboring woman: A step toward respectful maternity care. Indian J Community Med 2021;46:524-7

How to cite this URL:
Sharma B, Sikka P, Arora A, Assi GS, Suri V. A quality improvement study on improving communication between health-care provider and laboring woman: A step toward respectful maternity care. Indian J Community Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 27];46:524-7. Available from: https://www.ijcm.org.in/text.asp?2021/46/3/524/328159





   Introduction Top


Over the years, there has been a marked improvement in institutional births, but pregnancy-related mortality and morbidity still remain very high. Institutional delivery does not stand as a prerequisite for a woman receiving a good-quality care. Along with all the clinical care needed, experience of care also plays an important role to achieve the outcome. It has been found that disrespect and undignified care is highly prevalent all over the world undermining the care received by a pregnant woman.[1] There are various studies from low middle-income countries (LMIC) highlighting the health system failure, mistreatment, disrespect, and abuse during pregnancy and childbirth.[2],[3] Seven categories of disrespect and abuse in a facility-based maternity care were identified in a landscape analysis report by Bowser and Hill. It included physical abuse, nonconsented care, nonconfidential care, nondignified (including verbal abuse), discrimination based on specific patient attributes, abandonment of care, and detention in facilities.[4] To improve the care during childbirth and to reduce disrespect and abuse experienced by a childbearing woman, the World Health Organization (WHO) has introduced the concept of respectful maternity care (RMC).[5] RMC is an approach based on human rights to improve the women's experience of labor and childbirth further reducing perinatal mortality and morbidity. A number of interventions have been devised to reduce disrespect and abuse.[6] Effective communication among health-care providers (HCP) and laboring women is one of the key components to ensure women's needs and preferences. To implement the WHO recommendations of effective communication, this quality improvement (QI) process involving series of plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles was planned.


   Methodology Top


The study was conducted in the labor ward of a tertiary care hospital over a period of 8 weeks after the approval of the institutional ethical committee according to the model for improvement propagated by Institute for Healthcare Improvement.[7] Our labor ward is 14 bedded with two delivery tables and caters mainly high-risk obstetric population of Northern India with 6000 deliveries per annum. On an average, 35–40 women are being managed at a time in the labor room area by six junior residents, two senior residents, and one consultant. A self-designed questionnaire based on the WHO recommendations for effective communications during labor was used to assess the magnitude of nondignified and nonconsented care among laboring women. During the same time, the drivers of/reasons behind nondignified and nonconsented care were collected from HCP (residents posted in labor room) by using a self-designed questionnaire [Annexure 2] and [Figure 1]. Broadly, the steps were as follows: (a) measuring baseline data to assess the magnitude of nondignified and nonconsented care as (1) proportion of HCP introducing themselves to women; (2) addressing the patient by her name; (3) informed consent before each examination; and (4) informing the patient regarding the progress of labor, (b) eliciting possible drivers for nondignified and nonconsented care, and (c) conducting a series of PDSA cycles to sensitize the HCP with WHO recommendations of intrapartum communications. The baseline data were collected by interviewing 45 women who had normal vaginal delivery and proportions of the parameters for nondignified and nonconsented care mentioned above were calculated. The impacts of change of ideas were also assessed by interviewing almost 35–40 women using the same questionnaire used for baseline data. After implementing the new PDSA cycle, data were collected from 30 to 35 mothers after a week from the postnatal ward using the same questionnaire. Simultaneously, qualitative data were also collected from women in labor as well as from the HCP. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline variables and run charts were used to display the impact and progress of intervention in the labor room. The feedback and progress was discussed with the team and suggestions were taken for further improvement.
Figure 1: Drivers for nonconsented and nondignified care among health-care providers

Click here to view



   Results Top


The baseline data showed that the care being provided in the study area was nonconsented and nondignified as none of them were introducing themselves to the women in labor (0%) and did not address the patient/women by their name (0%). Verbal consent was obtained before clinical examination; only in 22% of cases, the information regarding the progress of labor was provided time to time [Run chart [Figure 2]]. A team of doctors (VS, BS, AA, PS) analyzed the problem and came up with change ideas. The behavior of HCP and laboring women was observed to understand the existing situation. A process map was made indicating the various contacts with different HCPs a woman has from admission till discharge [Figure 3]. A fishbone diagram was made to highlight the drivers of nondignified and nonconsented care [Figure 1]. As suggested by the process map, a laboring mother had to meet minimum six HCP from admission till the delivery so it was decided to make all the residents aware about the nondignified and nonconsented care in the labor room. After multiple sessions, we could sensitize the whole team of residents about the WHO recommendations for effective communication. After five PDSA cycles [Table 1], HCP started addressing women by their name (100%). In 93% of cases, verbal consent was obtained before each clinical examination and time to time information regarding the progress of labor was provided to 50% of cases. However, none of them started introducing themselves to the laboring women.
Figure 2: Progress of quality improvement study – Run chart

Click here to view
Figure 3: Process map

Click here to view
Table 1: Details of plan-do-study-act cycle

Click here to view


Qualitative data

The woman gave a feedback that “I do not mind sharing bed with another woman, I would like to come back for my next delivery as the treatment and behavior of the doctor who did my delivery was very nice.”

Another woman said that “I understand the workload and long duty hours of doctors, it is impossible to get the privacy or companion throughout the labor, still my mother was allowed to whenever she demanded.”

One of the junior residents said, “Even we know how to communicate with a laboring woman but it is not possible to work with same spirit and attitude for 12 h a day in a hectic labor room like this.”

Another doctor said, “Even I want to inform each and everything to each laboring women, but what I have realized over the time, it is useless to inform them as once you explain them everything, the very next moment they will ask you to repeat everything to their husband, mother in law or some relative or even neighbors too.”


   Discussion Top


In the present study, WHO recommendations for effective communication were successfully implemented by using QI methodology. In spite of limited space, resources, and huge burden of laboring women at a time, it was feasible to provide dignified and consented care. After multiple PDSA cycles, there was a marked improvement as HCP started addressing women by their name (0%–100%), verbal consent was obtained in 93% of cases which was earlier found to be in 47%. In spite of the workload, in 50% of cases, HCP were able to inform the complete progress of labor and once or twice in almost all the cases.

The quality of care during childbirth depends on how care is provided by HCP and how care is experienced by a woman with available resources, skills, and knowledge.[8] The need and priorities of women differ and it is difficult to quantify, prioritize, and meet their needs. Our society is patriarchal and women have limited control over decision about their care and consent and approval is always obtained from family members (husband or mother in law) as a routine. Still, each woman in labor needs emotional support, privacy, and birth companion. Compared to high-income countries, the challenges faced by obstetrician in LMIC are totally different. For example, in the facility of the present study, due to space constraints, laboring women have to share beds, birth companion cannot be adjusted and one doctor has to monitor 5–6 laboring women on an average. American college of Obstetrician and Gynecologist has special recommendations for obstetricians and gynecologists for effective communication which cannot be applied in our setup.[9]

With QI approach, it was possible to quantify the recommendations and implement and monitor the progress. In spite of the fact that every HCP wish to provide respect and quality care to each laboring woman, this study showed the prevalence of nondignified and nonconsented care in the facility of the current study. It was feasible to change the behavior of HCP and provide RMC with existing resources and staff. Even HCP felt satisfied when they were told about the progress and positive feedback shared by the patients. The limitation of the study suggests that out of four parameters studied, HCPs were not able to introduce themselves as they found it difficult to repeat their name again and again in the same room. However, with significant improvement in the parameters of consented and dignified care through effective communication, this study reveals that RMC can be achieved despite the odds.


   Conclusion Top


This pilot study has provided an insight into the feasibility of providing dignified and consented care to the laboring women irrespective of resources, facilities, or workload. QI approach can be used as a behavior change interventions to provide dignified and consented care. Laboring women do understand the limitations and are ready to adjust, what they need is effective communication, empathy, emotional support, kindness, privacy, and companion wherever possible. Although this study has demonstrated success over a short span with no extra resources in a tertiary care setting, for long-term sustainability, it needs to be monitored regularly.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Dr. Vanita Sapra for collecting the data. We are also thankful to all the residents of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology for their participation, cooperation, and support.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Mannava P, Durrant K, Fisher J, Chersich M, Luchters S. Attitudes and behaviours of maternal health care providers in interactions with clients: A systematic review. Global Health 2015;11:36.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med 2015;12:e1001847.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Bohren MA, Hanter EC, Munthe-Kass HM, Suza JP, Vagel JP. Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low-and middle-income countries: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Health J 2014;11:71.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring Evidence for Disrespect and Abuse in Facility-Based Childbirth. Boston: USAID-TRAction Project, Harvard School of Public Health; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
WHO Reproductive Health Library. WHO Recommendation on Respectful Maternity Care. The WHO Reproductive Health Library. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Reis V, Deller B, Catherine Carr CN, Smith J. Respectful maternity care. Country experience. 2012 https://www.k4health.org/sites/default/files/RMC%20Survey%20Report_0.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Dec 20].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Institute of Healthcare Improvement. Model for Improvement. Available from: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx. [Last accessed on 2020 Dec 20].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bante A, Teji K, Seyoum B, Mersha A. Respectful maternity care and associated factors among women who delivered at Harar hospitals, eastern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20:86.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no. 492: Effective patient-physician communication. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1254-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
           

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Search Pubmed for
    Search in Google Scholar for
  Related articles
    Article in PDF (582 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methodology
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed252    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded36    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

  Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Copyright and Disclaimer
  2007 - Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
  Online since 15th September, 2007